In a heated battle, U.S. Representative Warren Davidson is all out to take action against Gary Gensler, the head of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Davidson believes Gensler’s actions in regulating cryptocurrencies are biased and unjustified.
The entire crypto community is startled by Davidson’s viewpoint. The hashtag #FireGaryGensler is trending on Twitter all because Davidson’s views hold weight he is clear that the SEC’s chair is politically driven, trying to overcome crypto space and the biggest block in technological innovation.
Davidson’s Open Protests Against Gensler
This is not the first time Davidson disagreed with Genler’s actions. Wagging an open war, he introduced the “SEC Stabilization Act” to remove Gensler from his position. Davidson firmly believes that the capital markets need protection from what he sees as Gensler’s overreach. He wants to bring real reform and fire Gensler as the SEC Chair.
It is worth noting that, Davidson presented this bill after the SEC filed lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase. In response, representative Tom Emmer joined him, calling Gensler a regulator acting in bad faith. When lawmakers are charged with bad intentions who should we trust, is crypto trading safe in such a political upheaval, or it will all fade with ETF approval? Let’s understand more.
What Went Wrong with Gensler?
One of the positive events so far is the recent court ruling in favor of Grayscale’s ETF filing created a buzz in the market. It boosted Bitcoin by 6% after the decision. The unanimous support from three judges for Grayscale’s case caused discussions across the community and on crypto platforms like Twitter.
Representative Warren Davidson expressed his thoughts on his X post, saying, “Gary Gensler’s actions at the SEC are arbitrary and capricious.” He used this sentiment to renew his call to remove Gensler from his chair.
He quoted a recent court statement to support his stance, highlighting that the SEC’s denial of Grayscale’s ETF proposal was arbitrary and capricious.
Grayscale, a dominant player in the crypto industry, had halted its operations when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) objected to its GBTC over-the-counter application.
The primary cause of objection was that the product in question seemed to be “fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices are done.” Giving a strong reply, Grayscale took the battle to court, challenging the SEC’s rejection.
Overall, Davidson’s ongoing efforts to remove Gensler showcase the ongoing struggle between regulatory control and creating a friendly environment for cryptocurrencies. This situation underscores the need for fair and unbiased regulations that encourage innovation and protect investors’ interests.
Source: Read Full Article