FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has suggested two technology consultants, Edward Stroz and Michael McGowan, to help determine appropriate bail restrictions in his criminal fraud case.
This move came after US District Judge Lewis Kaplan asked SBF to propose at least one technical consultant to prevent him from more bail restrictions.
Fresh Allegations Levied
Federal prosecutors earlier alleged SBF of using encrypted-messaging apps and VPN to contact FTX employees and executives. Prosecutors asked the court to extend his bail conditions due to fresh allegations.
Moreover, the judge threatened to completely revoke SBF’s bail conditions and send him to jail if he is not satisfied with the restrictions, ahead of his trial in October.
Recently, Sam Bankman-Fried was hit with 4 new charges including securities fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud, political contributions that manipulated the U.S. 2022 midterm elections. SBF is under house arrest with a bond set at $250 million and his trial scheduled on October 2. As of now, Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to all counts of charges.
Meet The Technical Consultants
Edward Stroz has worked as an FBI agent for over 15 years and managed a global digital forensics and computer investigations firm for nearly two decades. Michael McGowan is a digital forensics consultant for more than 19 years.
He has led several high-profile cases, such as authenticating baseball player Alex Rodriguez’s text messages on drug use and revealing a forged contract in a lawsuit filed against Mark Zuckerberg for half his Facebook shares.
The Integrity Of The Judicial Process
SBF has pleaded not guilty to all the charges against him. The new charges brought against him include securities fraud, bank fraud, and political contributions that manipulated the U.S. 2022 midterm elections.
The case against SBF is under the scrutiny of the US judiciary, and it’s important to maintain the integrity of the process.
The use of technical consultants like Edward Stroz and Michael McGowan to determine appropriate bail restrictions is a positive step to maintain transparency in the case.
However, the case is ongoing, and the final verdict is yet to be decided. As the proceedings continue, it’s important to ensure that the integrity of the judicial process is upheld, and justice is served accordingly.
Source: Read Full Article