After attending this week’s Blockchain for Social Justice Workshop in San Francisco, ETHNews looks at the ways in which the two camps overlap.
The pursuit for social justice necessarily involves people from all walks of life, especially those who belong to marginalized communities. However, in a tech space dominated by straight, white men, an outwardly diverse gathering of individuals is not the norm – even if social good is a collective goal among the broader blockchain and cryptocurrency crowd. The terms “social justice,” “representation,” and “blockchain technology” are generally not uttered in the same breath.
Enter the Blockchain for Social Justice Workshop. Nestled in a cozy, classroom-sized corner of General Assembly’s San Francisco campus, the gathering was characterized by one word: diversity. In terms of audience members and panelists alike, the room was full of women, people of color, and folks from various educational, professional, and economic backgrounds. Core to the workshop’s discussion was unraveling the complementary nature of blockchain technology and the concept of social justice.
The night began with a presentation by Daisy Ozim, director of Blockchain for Social Justice, an organization that investigates this unlikely pair. She highlighted the various facets of the technology that make blockchain-based social justice solutions a worthy pursuit: decentralization, distribution, anonymity, and interoperability. These are all hallmarks of blockchain, to be sure, but under a social justice lens, the words have different meanings.
To break it down:
After Ozim’s presentation, the panelists mentioned a few social justice-oriented projects that make use of these qualities of blockchain technology. From the ecojustice side, for example, there is Nori, “a blockchain-based marketplace for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere,” according to the company’s website. On the content creation side, there is Po.et, which, by establishing a “decentralized protocol for content ownership,” has the potential to signal-boost traditionally underrepresented voices in publishing.
Other projects not mentioned range from promoting renewable energy use and re-engineering the process of charitable giving to providing a token for the LGBTQ+ community and creating a platform to enable a universal basic income.
In light of blockchain technology’s role in social justice causes, Ozim emphasized that the technology is not a panacea for the problems that marginalized communities face. There are various pitfalls associated with blockchain, such as greed, environmental degradation (through excessive mining, for example), job elimination through automation, and even the possibility of increased surveillance (many projects require users to provide access to their personal data).
At a practical level, blockchain-based social justice solutions could go awry despite people’s good intentions. We have seen this sort of effect in both US environmental policy and the country’s infamous War on Drugs. Additionally, as a hypothetical example, a blockchain record of human genetic DNA could be misused and appropriated for discriminatory practices in employment and healthcare (have you seen the movie Gattaca?). There is a balance to strike in these sorts of projects to mitigate the possible consequences.
All the potential drawbacks aside, panelist Jomari Peterson, founder of P2P payment and lending network The Digital Reserve, P.B.C., noted that a key characteristic in the overlap of blockchain and social justice comes from the ability to create a better world. The sheer number of token economies that exist, especially those that center around underrepresented communities, demonstrates individuals’ shared commitment to shepherd in a new and fairer “order,” so to speak.
This ability to cultivate new economies based on equitable governance structures offers a way to restructure incentive systems that, as they currently exist, do not benefit marginalized groups. A token-based economy that truly values its participants and their good behavior not only encourages stewardship at the community level but also within society at large.
Another workshop panelist, Chelsea Rustrum, believes these alternative paradigms have a personal effect in addition to their societal impact. “As we remap our systems, we need to remap ourselves,” she noted.
At the end of the day, if onlookers outside the blockchain space can see the positive effects of cryptocurrency on underrepresented communities, then perhaps that positivity could be translated to policies and economic practices across the board.
Source: Read Full Article